Why you should totally write about politics and be proud of it, too

This morning, the Twitterspere was all aflap about this piece of garbage:

The Top 7 reasons why posting politics kills your career

(please note that this post has been taken down by the site. They cited as reason that “it was acceptable to write about politics when the subject was academically well-researched”, and thus continued to completely mis-understand why this got so much vitriol on Twitter)

Writing about politics kills your writing career. Really?

Do these writers think that if you write any kind of fiction, you can write bland, faceless pap that does not touch on any political points?

Or maybe they confuddle “writing about politics” with “telling people how to vote”.

No, unless you’re a politician, you should probably stay away from the latter, at least in your fiction, and at least as narrator (your characters can totally tell people how to vote!), and maybe most of the time. Maybe. But… if you like politics, go kill the internet with it. We live in a free world.

So let’s just deconstruct this garbage article.

1. You’ll abandon your brand
So? My brand is fiction that cares about issues. It’s impossible to write about issues in society without touching on politics. Even if you wrote the most pappy of faceless pap, you’d still write about politics, by the sheer admission of avoiding politics. That’s politics, too. You know: don’t care, don’t vote, then complain your head off when you don’t like the results. Aren’t I glad voting in Australia is compulsory?

2. You could lose a reader
Yes, I could lose one. I could gain many more by being genuine and not talking rubbish faceless pap.
This is the problem with writers, or people in general: they want to be liked by everyone. This is impossible. It’s better to be hated by some and loved by others than for everyone to go “who the hell is that?”

3. Productivity And Quality Will SUFFER from flame wars
Yes, it does.
But why every in the world does she assume that writing about politics automatically draws you into flame wars? Ultimately, whether you get involved in flame wars is up to you. If you’re too juvenile to control your impulses to always have to have the last word, fine, avoid the subject. But then avoid Twitter and Facebook, too, and your friends and family might just appreciate it if you did an anger management course.
Sorry, we’re not all impulse-driven angry people. We’re adults and can discuss issues in an adult way, and walk away from those who can’t. Nothing to do with writing about politics.

4. You Could Be Marketing!
Seriously. I got no words. What does she think marketing is? Tweeting BUY MY BOOK? Social issues get people emotionally involved. Emotion forges connections. Connections sell books.
End of. Never heard anything more stupid in my life.

5. It’s Not A Good Look On You. Or Anyone
Do you think I care? Actually, do you think I care about people who care that I get passionate about things… that I get passionate about that also happen to be political. Stuff like equal opportunities for all, education and the biggie, environmental politics? Do you really want me to scrub that off my writing and are you telling me that will make me look better?
What absolute ROT.

6. You’ll Demolish Your Career Opportunities
Feel free to do a bank-account-off. Show me yours, I’ll show you mine. End of argument.

7. You’re Not An Expert (Unless You Are)
I have no words. So now we are supposed to have degrees before we can comment? Holy crap-a-mole. What, so my degree is in agriculture and that means I can only comment on that? Does it mean I am not qualified to vote.
Seriously FFS, I have never heard anything more stupid.

The entire article is just made of stupid.

To repeat: writing about politics is not the same as trying to convince someone that your viewpoint is right.
Writing about politics involves showing the different viewpoints and showing characters with those viewpoints and why they think the way they do.
Writing about politics involves characters expressing their opinions.

Where do you think Ambassador would be without politics?
On one side we have the inclusionist groups that includes Cory and much, but not all, of gamra. Then you have the conservatives including Sigobert Danziger (who is very much into local aid) and later the Pretoria Cartel, who are about business.

And what about Shifting Reality, which is all about how minorities and the disenfranchised are treated. It’s also about minorities within minorities, for example the gay community within the Indonesian section, as well as the ultra-right hypertechs.

Even the Icefire/Moonfire series is full of politics. The whole plot of the second trilogy would fall down without the climate/science aspect.

But any opinions are voiced by the characters. You do not get to know (although you can probably guess) what I as author think, but some characters represent viewpoints I don’t agree with. These are not always evil characters (actually, they rarely are).

My fiction is FULL of politics. I’m proud of it.


  1. You have to be true to yourself. Some of our best literature historically has been satire based on political beliefs. I am open to all opinions, even if I do not agree with them. If I simply can’t agree, I will move on. That does not imply that I do not respect that author or her opinions. Keep doing your thing. You are awesome at it.

  2. I liked you already, but I like you more now. 😉 Apart from all the ought/oughtn’t arguments, it makes better fiction. Characters will have political views, just as they have religious beliefs, senses of humour, fears, skin colours, loves or hatreds of boiled sprouts, and a position on the gender scale…

    And I don’t see how it’s possible to narrate any events, of any kind, without being political anyway. Politics is only life when you care about it. If the reader doesn’t care about the life that goes on in your books, they’ll stop being a reader.

    Don’t they say controversy is the best publicity, anyway – just to take one of those objections?

  3. PS ‘1984’ did OK for George Orwell, eh.

    • strange, I only seem to be able to approve these comments by replying to them. Just hitting “approve” doesn’t work. Very strange.

  4. I absolutely agree with you! I enjoy the Ambassador series simply because it does have so many viewpoints, and frequently strong political viewpoints! I cannot see the characters being as engaging as they are without those viewpoints. And, unfortunately, in the USA right now, polemicizing politics are happening now, and will happen for at least the next four years! So I enjoy “escaping” into fiction while still enjoying strong points of view.

  5. By the by, Ambassador 6 is now pre-ordered for me, and it is coming out on my birthday; what a nice giftie to me! Thanks!

  6. Hi Patty,

    enjoyed this post a lot! Shared it on Twitter. See you on Kboards.


  7. Getting up on a soapbox and preaching is probably not going to draw a large audience. But the author of that article should have taken a moment to check on the popularity of dystopian and post-apoc sci-fi. It’s huge in the YA sphere. One of the major problems with the world is avoidance of difficult issues. Fiction has long been a way of approaching hard choices and demonstrating the consequences.

Comments are closed